|
Remarks as Prepared
It is a great honor for me to join you here at the National
Press Club for your Newsmakers Luncheon. This is the second time I have done
this. The last time, 19 years ago when I was Secretary of the Navy, I got into
a little bit of trouble. I had decided to talk about the future of our foreign
policy and the force structure issues of all of the military services, which a
few people in the White House and the State Department thought was above my pay
grade as someone who was responsible only for the Navy. So I’ll try to stay out
of trouble today.
I have been fortunate to have a varied career. But let me
start by saying that, of all the professional experiences that shape my approach
to government, two stand out. The first is having commanded infantry Marines in
combat. Nothing else I’ve ever done can match the sobering sense of
responsibility that comes from making daily decisions that directly affect the
lives of others, including Marines on the one hand, and the civilian
noncombatants who populated much of our battlefield on the other.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
By Sen. Jim Webb
Two months after it convened, the historic 110th
Congress is off to a fast start, fulfilling its promise to improve
accountability in government and restore economic fairness to the
American people. The Congress is also working to advocate policies that
enhance our national security and standing in the international
community.
In the Senate, our first two bills involved issues
that were central to the American people last fall. First, with respect
to accountability, I am a strong believer that government should be
open, honest, and responsive to the people it serves. That's why in my
first week in the Senate, I became an original co-sponsor of ethics
reform legislation to clean up Congress and restore Americans' faith in
government. I have actively participated in oversight hearings to
ensure that our government serves the people -- not the powerful
lobbyists in Washington -- and spends your taxpayer dollars properly.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
The Virginia-Pilot editorializes in favor of Sen. Webb's new legislation:
Surely President Bush wouldn't make up a bond between Saddam Hussein and al-Qaida that didn't exist.
Surely in his run-up-to-war, 2003 State of
the Union speech, he wouldn't trumpet debunked claims about Saddam
scouting for nuclear material in Niger.
Surely he wouldn't authorize secret CIA
prisons with "alternative" interrogation methods or approve the
shunting of prisoners to countries skilled in the art of torture.
Surely he wouldn't defy 2006 election
results and the recommendations of the Iraq Study Group by intensifying
U.S. troop involvement in Iraq.
Surely he wouldn't launch an air strike on Iran without congressional approval.
Having seen so many "surely he wouldn'ts"
twist into "yes, he woulds," Sen. Jim Webb is justified in pushing for
a clear congressional statement guiding U.S. military involvement in
Iran.
Legislation recently introduced by the
freshman Democrat from Virginia clarifies that money can't be spent on
military operations in Iran without congressional approval. Clearly
defined exceptions include thwarting an imminent attack, responding to
an actual attack and continuing the "hot pursuit" of hostile forces
across the Iraq-Iran border. Nor would the resolution apply to
intelligence gathering or tactical operations in international waters
off Iran's coast.
Read the full article
|
|
|
On Sunday, March 11th, Senator Jim Webb appeared on ABC's "This Week" with George
Stephanopoulos to discuss his legislation prohibiting funding for military
operations in Iran without Congressional approval, Iraq, Walter Reed and other
issues.
Click here to watch video of Sen. Webb's appearance.
|
|
|
The Roanoke Times endorses Senator Webb's bill requiring President Bush to obtain Congressional approval before invading Iran:
President Bush needs to holster his guns before he leads America
into another unprovoked war. Virginia's freshman senator, Jim Webb, on
Tuesday offered legislation that clearly tells Bush that he cannot
invade Iran without congressional approval.
This should go without saying. However, Bush has clearly
demonstrated a pattern of blowing holes into the Constitution to
justify his distorted theories of executive power.
"This presidency has shot from the hip too many times for us to be able to trust it to act on its own," Webb said.
[...]
Webb's resolution begins to restore the balance of power, but it
does not strip from the president the needed ability to plan military
operations and to protect the U.S. and its allies from attack. Bush
could still use force to repel an attack launched from Iran and to
respond to actual or planned attacks begun elsewhere that spill over
into Iran.
What Bush could not do is launch an pre-emptive war on Iran without congressional approval.
Technically, he can't now; Webb's resolution would make sure even Bush knows this.
It's forceful language for a president who understands only force.
Read the whole editorial
|
|
|
|
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next > End >>
|
| Results 28 - 36 of 47 |